View Full Version : Need natures for my leaf green team.
15th September 2006, 3:54 PM
Any Last slot suggestions welcome. This is all just planned so edit anything.
15th September 2006, 4:11 PM
Blastoise:calm nature last move: hydro pump
Milotic:bold nature.Moves:surf,ice beam,hydro pump,recover
15th September 2006, 4:13 PM
Blastoise: Bold/Calm (Rapid Spin, Protect)
Flareon: Brave/Adamant (Overheat over Fire Blast)
-Crunch/Dragon Dance (Requires breeding)/Substitute
-Thunderbolt/Ice Beam/Brick Break/Focus Punch
15th September 2006, 6:00 PM
Adamant (Jolly is unnessecary in-game)
Snorlax works well to take care of your special weaknesses (especially your 3x Ice weakness).
16th September 2006, 1:29 AM
Is Muk good
16th September 2006, 2:08 AM
Calm with Mirror Coat, Bold with Counter
-Leech Seed/Sleep Powder
-Aerial Ace/Drill Peck
-Metal Sound/T Wave
Heres my suggestion for a 6th:
16th September 2006, 2:30 AM
Is Muk good
Weezing is arguably the best poison type ever.
Quiet nature works,since adamant/modest lower the other attacking stat,and my set is a split(2 ph-sp 2)
16th September 2006, 3:10 AM
^1.) that set is bad. weezing is not an attacker.
Weezing @ Lefties
Impish Nature (+Def, -Sp. Atk)
- Pain Split/Rest
- Sludge Bomb/Shadow Ball
- Fire Blast/Explosion
2.) i like muk better. :P
Muk @ Lefties
Adamant/Brave Nature (+Atk, -Sp. Atk/Spd.)
Trait: Sticky Hold
- Sludge Bomb
- Explosion/Brick Breack
- Explosion/Fire Blast
16th September 2006, 3:56 AM
^yes muk is an attacker.And a sp attacker.Good at it.WoW and pain split is for dusclops,something that doesn't have outstanding sp attack and attack IMO
Muk sucks compared to weezing,no matter how much anyone likes muk,he's still worse........sorry,he just is.........................
16th September 2006, 7:45 AM
yes he is and to shadow tyranitar: y do u make so many comments i see ur name all over the place and no one elses
16th September 2006, 7:35 PM
Is that a problem?I'm just helping people out............
16th September 2006, 7:57 PM
muk is NOT a special attacjer. :O
16th September 2006, 8:18 PM
I meant weezing.yes muk's a physical,but I was talking about weezing when I said he's a good physical and special atker.I'm not that dumb!
16th September 2006, 8:20 PM
weezing isn't a good special attacker either. :O
apparently you are that dumb.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.2.3 Copyright © 2017 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.