Kanto or Hoenn.

[DetIronix]

Hmm, whats a better, more fun and adventurous Region.

Hoenn


Or


Kanto?

Who else thinks Kanto pwns?
and Hoenn sucks?

Well here's your chance to post your views!


Enjoy

DetIronix

;]

[phantom.champion]

ill go for hoenn, somehow i feel like you are at a new area even if you've been there tons of times already and i also think that kanto is a really small region and i was really disappointed when started playing FR and found out that the only new addition were the sebii islands

[KGB13]

I liked and enjoyed both but I'll have to give it to Hoenn. I really liked the Tropical feel of the region and the pokemon. Plus the Battle Frontier in Emerald gives it way more replayability than FRLG.

[pokman]

Hoenn.

I don't like Hoenn that much though, perhaps because of the graphics. However, to me Hoenn is still better, probably cause it's not that hard to get around, as is Kanto unless you have a pokemon that can use the HM Fly.

[GolemGuy]

Hoenn dropkicks Kanto, combos with an uppercut, goes into an immediant flurry of random karate chops, and finally finishes with either a Falcon Punch or a roundhouse kick, which ever you prefer.

Hoenn, like previously said, makes you feel like it's a new adventure every time. It also has the best cast of charas.

[foxyman1167]

I prefer Kanto. It was more of a challenge, and FRLG's Elite Four got a boost after you beat them.

[Aladar]

IMO both are great, both have strong points and weakneses but Hoenn, sadly, has the dreaded sea route between Mosdeep and Sootopolis that just spams and spams and spams annoying water types.

[Ciccone]

Hmm, whats a better, more fun and adventurous Region.

All a matter of opinion right? I think the first image I get in my head when I hear "adventurous Pokemon game" is Sapphire (or Ruby/Emerald, whatever). Not only does the ingame music in Hoenn sound adventurous and fresh, the gameplay is fresh too. New Pokemon, tons of new things to discover, it's a real adventure. Kanto is ok, but I've played in Kanto in every generation to date and I would like a different challenge so Hoenn is a bit more adventurous to me.

[K-os]

Kanto might tie with it if you included the Sevii islands - otherwise Hoenn is much better.

The underwater region is just awesome, and the graphics are also more adventurous.

[SoulSilverMstr411]

Hoenn feels like a rehash of Kanto to me. Which is ironic 'cos Sinnoh has more in common with Kanto than Hoenn, and yet Sinnoh feels somehow fresh.

[treespyro]

Hoenn I feel is more fun travelling in, more time it takes

[Relinquish]

Hoenn, it introduced double battles and contests.

[Jibakushin]

I'd have to say Hoenn.

[Ash-kid]

I prefer Hoenn. More innovative. There are also many things that were not in Kanto, as competitions and contests and more interesting things that made me love it more.

[Volaro]

Kanto. Less water routes, and less HMs they force you to use.

[Narutopokedude]

Ho-ho-ho-hoenn all the way. Personally Kanto was my least favorite land, I even started with 2st gen as my favorite games. I just never liked them.

On the other hand, Hoenn is my absolute favorite. i love the pokemon, even though a lot people despise them for some reason, and the plot was great as well.

[Torpoleon]

I like both Kanto and Hoenn. They are different but both have cool features. All regions are different and special. The Sevii Islands were also a nice touch for Kanto.

[Emerald 2006]

Yeah, They're both nice,
but when it comes to nostalgia,
I'd go with Kanto every time.

[slowdude]

Hoenn
I liked the water routes for some reason.

[sealeo]

Hoenn is the better out of the 2 in my opinion. Probably because of the graphics and the ability to dive underwater.