
Originally Posted by
Night_Walker
It's going to have to, gameplay has hardly changed in almost a decade and now not only does it have the usual challengers in Battlefield, Halo and Killzone to deal with but soon it'll have Destiny and Titanfall as well.
Call of Duty always beats Battlefield in sales, and I guarantee this year will be no different. Halo and Killzone are both version exclusives, so I highly doubt they will beat out Call of Duty. Halo especially won't since many people are switching from Microsoft to Sony, and Halo 4 (at least in my opinion) was lackluster when compared to the previous games in the series. I wasn't impressed with Titanfall, and again, that is an Xbox exclusive so I don't see that outselling Call of Duty. Destiny was actually pretty good, but Call of Duty has such a large fanbase that I would be surprised if any new series or game (even one as good as Destiny) beat it. Should Call of Duty change? Yes. Do they need to? No.

Originally Posted by
Larry
Call me crazy but I never had a problem with death streaks. Idk maybe there was so much other bs that I didn't notice.
The only death streak in any game that I disliked was painkiller because extra health after only a couple deaths is way too cheap. I was all right with the others; if you're dying that much, I guess you should be given a boost.
Snake? Snake? Snaaaaaaake!!!