Page 5 of 5 FirstFirst 12345
Results 101 to 102 of 102

Thread: Should the 'Flying' type be replaced?

  1. #101
    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Posts
    782

    Default

    About flying type, I think that it could occur the following:

    * if the Pokemon can fly, then it is flying type.

    * if the Pokemon is a bird, then it is bird type.

    Then...

    * Pidgey would be bird/flying because it is a bird and can fly.

    * Doduo would be purely bird type, because in spite of it is a bird, it cannot fly, so it wouldn't have flying as secondary type.

    * Moltres would be fire/flying instead fire/bird. It is just the most sense choice to make it still seen as the legendary bird of fire, like Charizard being fire/flying or fire/dragon.

    On that way, assuming bird and flying aren't the same thing, it's not a problem if you say that Zubat is poison/flying, because flying isn't birdwise, but it is about its ability to fly (when I say fly, I don't mean the use of the move of same name).

    Gyarados is a specific case, anyways, I have always thought it was water/dragon before reading somewhere that is actually was water/flying. I got disapointed...

  2. #102
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    NW England
    Posts
    6,238

    Default

    Thread bumped by over a year shutting...
    Writing LJ Twitter Raptr


    MikeSharpeWriter.com -Project Elfish Jarate

    3DS - 3007 - 8991 - 4413 (VM/PM me to add you)

Page 5 of 5 FirstFirst 12345

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •