In the last 11 NFL seasons, there have been 5 wildcard teams in the superbowl: the '99 Titans (lost in the final seconds to the Rams), '00 Ravens (beat the Giants), '05 Steelers (beat the Seahawks; they were also the first 6th seed to win the SB), '07 Giants (beat the Patriots), and last year's Packers, who were a 6th seed. In fact, this time last year it looked like the Pack would miss the playoffs as Rodgers got a concussion in their loss to the Lions. They were far from anyone's SB favorites at that moment.
And if "better location" is such a major factor, then why is Green Bay, Wisconsin home to the only undefeated team? Why have the Patriots and Colts been the top two of the top teams of the 00s? "More money" is moot; every team has a salary cap and is free to manage it as they see fit.
I have claimed Giratina
idk. It differs from person to person I suppose.
I didn't say that Super Bowl favorites always won the Super Bowl. The examples you listed show how wonderful the Wild Card truly is since if a team gets really hot (Packers) they can go and win the Super Bowl by just sneaking in. Really now, let's note that the likes of the Chargers, Eagles, and Jets were among the favorites this year guys.
Better location is a factor since in cities like New York and Dallas go and support there team. Green Bay has always supported there team and it just shows how popular the NFL is. Green Bay isn't Jacksonville which is terrible. To answer your question, Green Bay is the only city to have an undefeated team is because they have Rodgers.And if "better location" is such a major factor, then why is Green Bay, Wisconsin home to the only undefeated team? Why have the Patriots and Colts been the top two of the top teams of the 00s? "More money" is moot; every team has a salary cap and is free to manage it as they see fit.
pirate detective
They could be. Right now the Patriots, Ravens, Steelers, Texans, Packers, Saints and 49ers are the only teams with a better record. A case could be made that the 7-5 Broncos could also be up there, since the other teams with the same record aren't clearly better. Even if they're not, they're certainly close, I don't see why you think he was joking.
Bears are pretty much done, especially because Forte got injured as well, but Houston has been doing great. I don't know exactly when Schaub was injured, but they're winning without him, aren't they?The Texans and Bears lost their QB's. Sorry they're done.
Eagerly waiting for: Monolith Soft Wii U game
Now you're pretty much contradicting yourself. All you have done is state that there is no parity in the NFL, but you have yet to provide solid evidence while those opposite of you have repeatedly brought evidence to support their arguments.
And while the Packers are without a doubt better than the Jags, Jacksonville is superior to Green Bay for pretty much everything else (unless you're a cheese-maker). Florida winter >>>>>>>>Wisconsin winter. Also, Florida has no state income tax, which is a big deal when you make millions (case in point: a factor in LeBron's decision to go to Miami instead of New York). On paper, Jacksonville would have a significant leg up over Green Bay in the Free Agency game.
Also, don't forget that 22 NFL teams (2/3 of the league) had a fair shot at picking Rogers before Green Bay did. And Tom Brady was a 6th round pick. They very well could have played for some other franchise and have made them great, but they passed on them.
I have claimed Giratina
Because they haven't shown themselves to be. They've been mediocre competition and started out 1-5. Their defense has certainty stepped up in the last few weeks but they aren't in the top 10. Over their six game win streak, they've beaten mediocre teams and were beaten badly by the Lions. Many of those games were won in the last minute as well. Tebow is comparable to the Wild Cat from a few years ago right now. Packers, Steelers, Saints, Texans, Patriots, Cowboys, Giants, Ravens, Falcons, Bengals, 49ers, and Titans. At least 10 of those are better than them. You can argue whether or not the Bengals and Titans are though.
Yeah but without Schaub I'm hard pressed to see them winning the Super Bowl.Bears are pretty much done, especially because Forte got injured as well, but Houston has been doing great. I don't know exactly when Schaub was injured, but they're winning without him, aren't they?
Show me where instead of just stating it?
This is why I'm pretty much contradicting myself? As I already stated, parity can't exist in a passing league where Quarterbacks aren't on relatively similar grounds. Most teams don't have reliable QB and they lack anything like the 49ers to support their average QB. This is a fact. That's why people put so much emphasis on the QB position because if you don't have a reliable one you can't win long term. Look at the past Super Bowl champions and what do they have in common? All had pretty damn good Quarterbacks.All you have done is state that there is no parity in the NFL, but you have yet to provide solid evidence while those opposite of you have repeatedly brought evidence to support their arguments.
http://nbcsports.msnbc.com/id/39020280/ns/sports-nfl/
http://www.usatoday.com/sports/footb...ty-cover_N.htm
http://www.coldhardfootballfacts.com...finally!).html
A year or two old but there aren't articles on NFL parity every week sadly.
If the fans don't support the team then it doesn't matter whose winter is better since the team will just move out of there just like the Jaguars are going to because Jacksonville doesn't support them at all. Location has to do more than whether or not a city is in the North or South. Really now. There's a reason why no one is lining up to go to Jacksonville.And while the Packers are without a doubt better than the Jags, Jacksonville is superior to Green Bay for pretty much everything else (unless you're a cheese-maker). Florida winter >>>>>>>>Wisconsin winter.
Except the Jaguars are proving otherwise. Last I checked, Green Bay was never in danger of having their team leave because of lack of fan support. Also, the biggest factor to Lebron's decision was that Wade was staying in Miami and that Bosh was going. It's hilarious how people are trying to bring up Jacksonville as a reason why location isn't important especially when they disregard the fact that I also mentioned that management was important. Sure Jacksonville is pretty but its fans suck and that's why the Jags are probably going to move.Also, Florida has no state income tax, which is a big deal when you make millions (case in point: a factor in LeBron's decision to go to Miami instead of New York). On paper, Jacksonville would have a significant leg up over Green Bay in the Free Agency game.
Management's fault? There's a chance that we'd probably be talking about how bad the Patriots and Packers are without them. Remember now, the Patriots coach was nothing before he had Brady. I don't know what else you want me to say to this. I've already stated that Quarterbacks are the most important position in the league and that they can make or break teams.Also, don't forget that 22 NFL teams (2/3 of the league) had a fair shot at picking Rogers before Green Bay did. And Tom Brady was a 6th round pick. They very well could have played for some other franchise and have made them great, but they passed on them.
Last edited by Vern; 7th December 2011 at 10:30 PM.
pirate detective
I find Dallas the most overrated team in football, to be honest. Denver might be facing subpar teams, but at least they beat them. Dallas' loss to Arizona really sticks out, and they barely beat Miami and Wahington. I don't see how they're better than Denver. I think they're about the same.
Sure, but that could be said for any team, really, maybe even Green Bay. Houston is nowhere near "done" yet.Yeah but without Schaub I'm hard pressed to see them winning the Super Bowl.
Eagerly waiting for: Monolith Soft Wii U game
I don't know what's into you, but what I tell you is that there was Tebow Hour on ESPN today.@thewatersgreat guardian.
Hello Serebii Forums!
~TotodileIsBeast
All of the power to you if you do find them overrated. Denver is still a far cry from actually being able to do something in the playoffs and I still believe that Dallas is better.
Because it's true for just about and and every team including Green Bay. Unless the back-up Quarterback of a team is somehow just as good as their starter, they probably won't be getting too far. Especially in the case of the Texans where they lost their Running back and their primary receiver are injured. Well, the receiver got re-injured but he's day-to-day.Sure, but that could be said for any team, really, maybe even Green Bay. Houston is nowhere near "done" yet.
pirate detective
I don't see what Dallas has that Denver doesn't, really.
I still believe Houston can go far without their quarterback. They've been winning games, and that's all that matters. Teams can win a Superbowl without a decent quarterback. Sure, he might be the most critical player for most teams, but if teams can win without one, then they don't have to worry about him being injured. If a team has a great running/defense combination, they don't need a good quarterback.Because it's true for just about and and every team including Green Bay. Unless the back-up Quarterback of a team is somehow just as good as their starter, they probably won't be getting too far. Especially in the case of the Texans where they lost their Running back and their primary receiver are injured. Well, the receiver got re-injured but he's day-to-day.
Eagerly waiting for: Monolith Soft Wii U game
I am so excited. K-State is in a BCS Bowl game! First time in it seems like forever. (Oh, and I wouldn't be so excited if the Chiefs weren't so riddled with injuries that they are looking at like 3rd or 4th string people, sometimes even the practice squad.)
Spoiler:- Last times:
So I predicted every game using ESPN, and heres what I got.
NFC
1. Packers 16-0 (No losses, really believe they're capable of being all time greats)
2. 49ers 13-3 (1 loss to the Steelers)
3. Saints 13-3 (No more losses, getting hot at the right time)
4. New York (4 game win streak and sweeps Dallas)
5. Atlanta 10-6 (1 loss to the Saints)
6. Lions 10-6 (1 loss to the Packers)
AFC
1. Steelers 13-3 (They win out, even after getting swept by Baltimore)
2. Patriots 12-4 (1 loss to... The Broncos. Hear me out, Tebow can get into a shoot out. He did it with a better defense in Minnesota, and the Denver defense has been great)
3. Houston 12-4 (1 loss to the Bengals)
4. Denver 11-5 (Win out)
5. Baltimore 12-4 (1 loss to the Bengals)
6. Bengals (win out)
Playoffs
Wild Card
Bengals over Houston- Losing Schaub AND Johnson will be too much.
Baltimore over Denver- Miracle has to end. Tebow will cry after a game with 2 rushing TDs and 5 picks.
New Orleans over Detroit- Already happened this year, can't see it happening any differently
New York over Atlanta- Playing in New York is tough. Even for the Packers.
Divisional
Steelers over Bengals- Sorry Dalton, time for the big boys to take over. Rothelisberger throws 5 TDs in an unremarkably 1 sided match.
Ravens over Patriots- Sorry that Defense needs some fixing.
Green-bay over New York- If they can't beat them at Metlife, they sure as hell won't beat em in Lambeau.
New Orleans over San Francisco- Like last years Falcons, they're 1 and done.
Championship
Ravens over Steelers- Steelers cant seem to beat Baltimore this year.
Green Bay over New Orleans- May be the offensive match of the century. Both teams playing for their second superbowl in 3 years. Predict a high score as both teams are capable of running the ball and throwing. 52-49 packers. Unbelievable game despite the weather.
Superbowl
Packers over Ravens- Finally those Miami Dolphins can shut the hell up. Ravens Defense doesn't let Rodgers have an amazing game. 4 TDs 3 INTS. Flacco gets picked off on the last meaningful play of the game by Charles Woodson who picks up the superbowl MVP award.
agree with everything except tebow crying. I think he has matured a bit from college. I do think that if denver makes it, they get knocked out in the first round though. What Tebow is doing there is great, I am just not sure if he can do it against a defense like the ravens yet. I do disagree with 5 picks, if there is one thing I have seen this year, when tebow has been allowed to throw, he does not make the stupid pass you expect from a guy who hasn't played a full season
Last edited by TheWatersGreatGuardian; 8th December 2011 at 4:14 AM.
"What good is it for a man to gain the world, yet forfeit his soul?"
A better Quarterback, better receivers?
I made a mistkae in my last post. Their RB isn't injured. I remembered incorrectly there. :3 I agree with the last sentence. I disagree that they don't need to worry that their most critical player is injured. He's the most critical player on the Texans and his loss will impact them.I still believe Houston can go far without their quarterback. They've been winning games, and that's all that matters. Teams can win a Superbowl without a decent quarterback. Sure, he might be the most critical player for most teams, but if teams can win without one, then they don't have to worry about him being injured. If a team has a great running/defense combination, they don't need a good quarterback.
pirate detective
^ Dumping off screens to Moreno and Mcgeehee?
Hello Serebii Forums!
~TotodileIsBeast
Lol @ The Chiefs
haha he really doesn't have weapons, Thomas is decent but still, he's a good leader but not an amazing QB or anything people think he is, because I'm not buying him until he beats a good team, aka The Patriots as Kazekage said.
OOOOOOOOOH YEEEEEEAH! I'm back bois!
Browns @ Steelers tonight!
I would be *mildly* scared if this game was in Ohio, but the Browns will probably get MASSACRED in Pittsburgh. We've proven capable over *barely* avoiding trap games.
10 Browns-Steelers 35
LET'S GO STEELERS!!!