I'll just paraphrase my favorite little exchange out of the bunch:
"The argument that marijuana offenders are filling up and draining the resources of prisons is false, as very few are actually incarcerated."
You (in direct reply):
"Non-violent offenders [such as drug possession] should not be criminalized on that basis, preventing them from getting certain jobs, etc."
Maybe not an entirely unfair point to argue, but as you can see, it bears little to no relevance to mine, even though it was presented as a direct counterpoint. Hence, "you misread and disregard my post in favor of substituting in your own perceived partial, malformed arguments".