*agrees with you a little*
Still isn't as bad as gamefaqs.
And to think GPD was the only place I ever posted when I first started out here. It was less bad a year ago, I think.
It's not a bad book. The writing manages to drag you in and it does what it sets out to do- it tells a story awfully well. My only gripe with it is that it's terribly overrated, and it does have faults. Like I said though, it's not bad. Most people enjoy it.
Best thing about medieval history: Since everyone had pretty much the same names, they all get awesome descriptors as part of the name they're remembered by. Like instead of Edward son of Edward II, he's Edward, The Black Prince. Or like instead of Charles VI he's Charles the Mad. Or instead of Louis XIII (a problem with French kings because they pretty much all were named either Louis or Charles) Louis the Chaste (or gay depending on who you believe.) Or, even more awesome, ridiculous stuff like Charles the Bald, or Ivan the Ignorant (who was severely mentally handicapped btw.)
I just watched The Shining. Jack Nicholson is creepy. All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy.
Your image was over the 40000 pixels so it was removed. Please read the signature rules.
To Kill a Mockingbird as a book is a bit overrated in my opinion. It's not bad, though. I actually enjoyed it. However, I really don't think it's as good as teachers make it out to be.
Whoever mentioned Something Awful...
Goes on for a few pages.
Is there anyone on here knowledgable about TV's? Cause I got an issue.