Page 3 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast
Results 41 to 60 of 76

Thread: Perpetual Motion Vs. Magnet Risers

  1. #41
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Posts
    67

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Aenea View Post
    In that case please do edit the OP to its original state removing Metroid, Alcatraz, and Gearflow.
    Scuba is offline.




    **Credit to Anak & Eevee**

  2. #42
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Location
    Illinois
    Posts
    504

    Default

    I don't like you Aenea. Just wanted you to know that.



  3. #43
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Posts
    529

    Default

    I only brought the issue up because I believe in the same rules for everyone. One day, you might be in my position and insist upon the same.


    Sig credit: Extroph. I still love you Azu!! And pkmnfn for the userbar :3

    Psychotic Revolution Xat

    (01:20:25) *** Your rank in Standard OU is 139/49693 [1341 points / 99 battles]! *I suck at laddering*

  4. #44
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Location
    Rokkenjima
    Posts
    137

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Aenea View Post
    I only brought the issue up because I believe in the same rules for everyone. One day, you might be in my position and insist upon the same.
    i certainly hope you don't scuba/zero. i'd be very disappointed.

    anyway, sena updated, new rule is in there now, so new rule is now recognized, if not viewed as necessary or beneficial. but oh well. rules are rules. CC vs. TA (or whichever war it was) must have been quite interesting to create the need for a rule like that.

    sorry sky, gear, metroid. looks like we can't just have fun with this.

        Spoiler:- Pokemon Masterclass V.4 2nd Place:




  5. #45
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Location
    Inside Zach Galifinakis
    Posts
    161

    Default

    Late but GL to both sides ^.^
    Black FC: 0905-8396-1651
    Black 2 FC: 0734-2563-1464



    LOOKING FOR THE FOLLOWING POKEMON:
    *UNTRAINED*


    HAVE THE FOLLOWING FOR TRADE:
    Adamant + Jolly / Naďve / Naďve + Modest

    LEGENDS:
    G1:
    G2:
    G3:
    G4:
    G5:

  6. #46
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Location
    Illinois
    Posts
    504

    Default

    "Once the war thread has been posted and is awaiting approval, that it, line-ups on that post will are not allowed to change. So it is recommended that you add a substitutes line-up to the war line-up / post so when one of your members can't battle, you can sub them out. Like the main line-up, a substitute line-up can't change once the thread is posted / submitted for approval."

    Princess Beach wasn't part of that original line-up, so she can't battle. You never sent me a final UU player so they weren't part of the original line-up, So Aenea has to battle DM and AuraWarrior has no opponent, so he gets the win. You want to play by the rules, then we'll play by the rules.


    Last edited by Scubasteve23; 25th July 2012 at 8:28 PM.



  7. #47
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Location
    Liverpool
    Posts
    386

    Default

    I rather not get involved but i am at the point where i can't sit here while both sides being childish, just stop please both clans that is too, sena will not be impressed and won't be on today due to his bday and no arguing over auras win just let sena sort it out or decide.
    Last edited by Rairyan; 25th July 2012 at 9:13 PM.



  8. #48
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    England
    Posts
    1,565

    Default

    sena will not be impressed
    Damn right I won't be impressed. Seriously, what is this? -____-

    Seems this war was badly managed from the start / either side don't know what they are doing. The line-up rule applies to switching members around that are not on the substitute list etc, so if someone sent a line-up that wasn't completed, what the other side should have done was actually communicate and make sure the other team added another person in for this to properly start :s. Without a complete line-up, this war should never have started at all. All this could have been avoided with friendly communication, come on. -_____-

    As the line-up wasn't complete, then it isn't unreasonable for it to be completed now. The line-up rule applies to completed line-ups changing to someone not in the substitutes list, cause I would expect people to get simple things such as how many members are playing right. :s

    Or I can just lock this thread now and that will be the end of it, your choice.

    (Take this as me grilling both sides for failing to get this sorted on day one).
    Last edited by Ragnarok; 25th July 2012 at 9:23 PM.

    Nomura after being asked a question
    about Final Fantasy Versus XIII

  9. #49
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Location
    Rokkenjima
    Posts
    137

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Ragnarok View Post
    Damn right I won't be impressed. Seriously, what is this? -____-

    Seems this war was badly managed from the start / either side don't know what they are doing. The line-up rule applies to switching members around that are not on the substitute list etc, 1. so if someone sent a line-up that wasn't completed, what the other side should have done was actually communicate and make sure the other team added another person in for this to properly start :s. Without a complete line-up, this war should never have started at all. 2. All this could have been avoided with friendly communication, come on. -_____-

    3. As the line-up wasn't complete, then it isn't unreasonable for it to be completed now. The line-up rule applies to completed line-ups changing to someone not in the substitutes list, cause I would expect people to get simple things such as how many members are playing right. :s

    Or I can just lock this thread now and that will be the end of it, your choice.

    (Take this as me grilling both sides for failing to get this sorted on day one).
    just saying

    1. we shouldnt be expected to look out for them and correct their mistakes. Thats not our job. we have our own clan to make sure we aren't making mistakes with. We just go with what they give us.

    2. Theres no such thing as friendly communication with Aenea (chew) trust me i tried

    3. It would be completely unreasonable as it would violate one of your rules there is no part of your rule that depicts an exception for incomplete teams. As you said, that should be simple enough to be prevented. BUT. regardless of that, your rule is simply

    Line-Ups don't change once the thread is posted.

    rules must be followed. Aura forfeits and Aenea is battling me now. We're just trying to follow your rules man!

    or you know we could just remove that rule since its causing more trouble rather than preventing it
    Last edited by DeviantMaster; 25th July 2012 at 9:59 PM.

        Spoiler:- Pokemon Masterclass V.4 2nd Place:




  10. #50
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Posts
    529

    Default

    Seriously if you argue with Sena he'll just lock the thread, and also trust me I've been completely civil with you this entire time.

    So can we get on with the war now?


    Sig credit: Extroph. I still love you Azu!! And pkmnfn for the userbar :3

    Psychotic Revolution Xat

    (01:20:25) *** Your rank in Standard OU is 139/49693 [1341 points / 99 battles]! *I suck at laddering*

  11. #51
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    England
    Posts
    1,565

    Default

    1. we shouldnt be expected to look out for them and correct their mistakes. Thats not our job. we have our own clan to make sure we aren't making mistakes with. We just go with what they give us.
    As this war involves two clans, yes, I expect someone to spot mistakes in line-ups and kindly inform the other side that they are lacking a member on the main line-up.

    3. It would be completely unreasonable as it would violate one of your rules there is no part of your rule that depicts an exception for incomplete teams. As you said, that should be simple enough to be prevented. BUT. regardless of that, your rule is simply
    I just said that my line-up rule covers completed line-ups and substitutes, it doesn't account for people failing to to do something as simple as having a complete list and making sure everything is sorted before the war thread goes. In this case, the line-up wasn't completed at the fault of the clan leader failing to send a complete list, and the other clan for failing to mention it / inform the other clan that they were missing a member, nobody is innocent here.

    Line-Ups don't change once the thread is posted.

    rules must be followed.

    or you know we could just remove that rule since its causing more trouble rather than preventing it
    Read up.

    And nope.

    Seriously if you argue with Sena he'll just lock the thread
    I'm tempted.

    Nomura after being asked a question
    about Final Fantasy Versus XIII

  12. #52
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Location
    Rokkenjima
    Posts
    137

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Ragnarok View Post
    As this war involves two clans, yes, I expect someone to spot mistakes in line-ups and kindly inform the other side that they are lacking a member on the main line-up.



    I just said that my line-up rule covers completed line-ups and substitutes, it doesn't account for people failing to to do something as simple as having a complete list and making sure everything is sorted before the war thread goes. In this case, the line-up wasn't completed at the fault of the clan leader failing to send a complete list, and the other clan for failing to mention it / inform the other clan that they were missing a member, nobody is innocent here.



    Read up.

    And nope.



    I'm tempted.
    agree to disagree. I dont want to argue any further as you are a mod

    lets just get on with the war

        Spoiler:- Pokemon Masterclass V.4 2nd Place:




  13. #53
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    England
    Posts
    1,565

    Default

    Here is another proportion which doesn't alter the line-up.

    You can just disregard the UU portion of this clan war and make it OU only. With pairs of 7 for BW OU, the war can still go smoothly and both clans can use this as a learning experience I guess. (._. )

    Of course I will recommend both clans go down this route.
    Last edited by Ragnarok; 25th July 2012 at 10:21 PM.

    Nomura after being asked a question
    about Final Fantasy Versus XIII

  14. #54
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Location
    Rokkenjima
    Posts
    137

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Ragnarok View Post
    Here is another proportion which doesn't alter the line-up.

    You can just disregard the UU portion of this clan war and make it OU only. With pairs of 7 for BW OU, the war can still go smoothlyand both clans can use this as a learning experience I guess. (.-.)

    Of course I will recommend both clans go down this route.
    agreed. will contact scuba and get his word.

        Spoiler:- Pokemon Masterclass V.4 2nd Place:




  15. #55
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    maine
    Posts
    42

    Default

    Will I have to redo my battle?
    I hope not, I'm rubbish at OU.

    i dont know

  16. #56
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Posts
    529

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Epouvantail View Post
    Will I have to redo my battle?
    I hope not, I'm rubbish at OU.
    He's proposing nullifying your battle.

    To be honest I don't think this is fair and we should add a second UU battler...


    Sig credit: Extroph. I still love you Azu!! And pkmnfn for the userbar :3

    Psychotic Revolution Xat

    (01:20:25) *** Your rank in Standard OU is 139/49693 [1341 points / 99 battles]! *I suck at laddering*

  17. #57
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Location
    Illinois
    Posts
    504

    Default

    Well drop the entire UU thing all together. So Aenea wil battle master in OU and we will play the UU as if it never was. The war will now be a 7v7 straight up OU.



  18. #58
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Location
    Liverpool
    Posts
    386

    Default

    active post just waiting for my foe because he is not ready yet.



  19. #59
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    maine
    Posts
    42

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Scubasteve23 View Post
    Well drop the entire UU thing all together. So Aenea wil battle master in OU and we will play the UU as if it never was. The war will now be a 7v7 straight up OU.
    Okie dokie.
    Chuck and I will try our best to forget about that match ever happening.

    i dont know

  20. #60
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    Toronto, Canada
    Posts
    187

    Default

    Beat PA in a gg



Page 3 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •