
Originally Posted by
RaZoR LeAf
IMO, the Pokedex entries are based on folklore, legend and rumour, and should not be considered fact. This would explain why they are so contradictory of the actual truth. If Charizard "spits fire that is hot enough to melt boulders" then it should be able to defeat rock types in seconds, but the fact is that it cannot. However an observer of Charizard may see one spitting fire that over time, melts a boulder, then they can mince their words and leave out certain truths to exaggerate what they see or know. Have you never heard that lemmings jump of clifs to their deaths, or ostriches bury their heads in the sand, or that earwigs crawl into our ears when you sleep? All untruths, but people believe them, because they are passed around as facts.
So does Alakazam have an IQ of 4000? No, but it's probably pretty smart and when it was observed by the people who wrote that, was determined to be considerably smarter than any other pokemon that were around it.
Does Metagross have the brain power of four super computers? Doubtful, but what's to say when the entry was written it didn't? The iPhone is more powerful than the computer than put Apollo 11 on the moon. Back in 1979, it was considered a super computer.
Just because the pokedex says something, doesn't make it true.