Way to ignore my big post revolving around this point when it aired in Japan.
Originally Posted by Ciccone
Point: If Cameron can beat Ash without losing his 5 Pokemon why disqualify him.
Cameron would've only been disqualified had it come to the point where Ash beat Lucario, Cameron had no more, thus it would lose.
Just because it was a full battle doesn't mean a person has to have all 6 Pokemon.
Or should Tobias have been disqualified because he only used 2 Pokemon against Ash?
And there is no difference between the two situations, it's the same basic principle, which can only be divergent or problematic should the problem arise. It never does end up being a problem, so why disqualify Cameron for that.
He would've only been disqualified IF he had no more Pokemon to use, not because he blurted out that he only brought 5 Pokemon. It was Cameron that put himself at a disadvantage and would've been his own fault if he lost.
But you can't disqualify someone like that in the middle of the battle, when even if the odds are slim, Cameron didn't even need all 6 of his Pokemon to win.
Last edited by dman_dustin; 7th April 2013 at 12:12 AM.
Misinterpreting my posts is not your fault, negative repping me, and getting very sensitive about my posts because you misinterpreted my posts however is your fault. Think really hard, before negative repping or making a big deal about my posts. I don't appreciate being negative repped for reasons that are a result of misinterpreting my posts.