and yes preferences are preferences, but it's fairly obvious that they won't just cut the amount of legendaries, as the numbers just go up. eventually the number might level off, but dropping is highly unlikely, as they are a big selling point in the game as well, along with the box legends
Last edited by BCVM22; 7th May 2013 at 7:02 AM.
A new region awaits us, soon we shall uncover and unlock everything it has to offer...
Regardless, I am saying as to why there SHOULD be less legends not that there WILL. It's fully up to GF to decide whats good for the franchise. As I said eairler, I'm just saying why I feel there should be less legends.
Welp, here it goes. Ladies and gentlemen, prepare to be shocked, but Rayze Darr disagrees with the majority.
... yeah anyway. One of my absolute favorite things about Pokemon games are the quests to hunt down Legendaries. One of the main reasons that R/S/E are my absolute favorite Pokemon games is the Regi hunt. Here we have mythical creatures that we would never even know existed had we not sought them out, and each one is sealed off by an extremely well done translation puzzle. I did, actually, do the Regi hunt once without a guide, years after my last playthrough to ensure I remembered nothing, and it is one of my, if not my absolute, favorite memories in the entire Pokemon franchise.
I'm all for there being a lot of new Legendaries. I would, however, like to emphasize that I only really want this if they manage to make each encounter unique. I say give us a ton of lost caverns, hidden temples, ancient towers, and the works, and give us a Legendary for each of them. This is one of my biggest complaints so far about B2W2 (currently doing my first playthrough), that the Muskateer Trio jumps at you, all but smacking you in the face. They're impossible to miss, there are no cool environments or puzzles surrounding them, and they're EXTREMELY easy to catch.
So while I'm all for there being a metric ton of new Legendaries, I really hope they at least make them all exciting.
Spoiler:- My Blog and Friend Codes:
The Doctor: 'People assume that time is a strict progression of cause to effect, but *actually*
from a non-linear, non-subjective viewpoint - it's more like a big ball of wibbly wobbly... time-y wimey... stuff.'
In other words: Time is Complicated.
I'm under no misconception as to what you meant. "Need" is another of those words that gets tossed about in discussions like this without it actually meaning anything. There is no definition of "need". I could say something outlandish like "we don't need Legendaries period" and it would make just as much (i.e. very little) sense.
By ur logic, GF wouldn't have a made a new mewtwo forme, given the backlash it got. So, yeah they won't look it stuff like that. They just do what they think is good.
and believe it or not, the majority of the fan base absolutely loved the mewtwo form when it was first released. You would be surprised what you find out if you actually take the time to find it.
I was saying that just coz some of of you guys would not like it, doesn't mean the whole fan base will not like. There are many who want less legends.
And again, I'm not saying as to whether this will happen or not. I'm just saying as to why I FEEL it SHOULD happen, not that it will happen. It's completely my opinion. You are free to disagree but please take the time to read it and understand it before just brushing t down the rug.
and by the bolded, what are YOUR valuable reasons then? because there really isn't no reason they would but please do go on
also the majority of the fan base wouldn't like it, again you would be surprised what you find out if you would take the time to look for it
I'm hoping the legendary pokemon are not too overpowered. Say, 800 base stat total would be way overpowered.
Spoiler:- Credit + Claim: