Page 2 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast
Results 21 to 40 of 65

Thread: Are the New Pokemon Overpowered?

  1. #21
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    8,915

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Excitable Boy View Post
    ie they're weaker

    which is what I believe Rakurai said originally, which you then interpreted as the extreme
    That's what I said, exactly. Not every Pokemon is going to be able to beat Mewtwo but that in no way means they suck just because they can't.
    I'm part of the staff at Project Pokemon! Smod in forums, AOP in IRC, Administrator on Shoddy. Come visit us. Our Project is Pokemon!

  2. #22
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Posts
    58

    Default

    Johto was underpowered in my opinion, since Kanto had like base 120 attack on a lot of Pokemon. Hoenn was on average stronger than Kanto, Sinnoh ties with Kanto in my opinion, and Unova was overpowered. I mean Darmanitan with 140 base attack? Really?
    I AM NERDZ! YOU SHALL OBEY ME OR FACE THE CONSEQUENCES!

  3. #23
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Outside of Hawaii (I wish...)
    Posts
    5,937

    Default

    I think the reason why a lot of Unova Pokemon are so good is because only a minimal portion of their low BST is invested in worthless stats they have little use for (IE, special attack for Scrafty and Darmanitan, speed for Ferrothorn).

    Tons of the older Pokemon could be far better if their stats were more specialized instead of being horribly average.

  4. #24
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Lala Land!
    Posts
    918

    Default

    If trade cannot be done to older gen because they remodeled the base stats of all Pokemon (strong to be slightly weaker and weak to be slightly stronger), it will be a great challenge!

    Either way IVs also contribute to overpowering Pokemon more.
    I am a double specialist. WHITE2: 1121 0830 9265. Greenwich Mean Time+8

    "I battle to have fun, thus I battle to lose." (sizida's philosophy)

    My Pokémon journey is coming to an end! 5th gen is my last game. Time to embark on a journey to get paid!

    *~sizida's Pokémon Rakuen~* is my 5th gen trade shop! Though I prefer it to be my backyard~ Hope you guys can visit it!


    Thanks dratinitamer for the kickbutt siggy!

  5. #25
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Location
    NJ, USA
    Posts
    20

    Default

    Too early to tell, although Xerneas and Yveltal look amazing.
    White Elite Team:

  6. #26
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Posts
    269

    Default

    Wait a minute weren't the gen V starters the weakest starters overall in terms of base stat totals? I do believe though that there were a lot of powerful pokemon introduced in gen V like Darmanitan, Excadrill and Volcarona to name a few. However Volcarona in my opinion was maybe a second pseudo-legendary as it seemed to be one in the way it was an interactable pokemon, very high level and in an area you get to near the end of the game. Having these other powerful pokemon was probably supposed to make up for the not so good starters?
        Spoiler:- Shinies:

  7. #27
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Location
    BRONX
    Posts
    55

    Default

    Well NO because pokemon with amazing attack and stuff have horrible speed so they all have flaws


    MY BLACK FC: 4642 5240 8797
    My black2 FC 5415 8754 8627


    .

  8. #28
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    Apophenia
    Posts
    4,435

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Rakurai View Post
    I think the reason why a lot of Unova Pokemon are so good is because only a minimal portion of their low BST is invested in worthless stats they have little use for (IE, special attack for Scrafty and Darmanitan, speed for Ferrothorn).

    Tons of the older Pokemon could be far better if their stats were more specialized instead of being horribly average.
    This.

    Quote Originally Posted by sizida View Post
    If trade cannot be done to older gen because they remodeled the base stats of all Pokemon (strong to be slightly weaker and weak to be slightly stronger), it will be a great challenge!

    Either way IVs also contribute to overpowering Pokemon more.
    What do IVs have to do with anything?
    We're nothing more than concreteness victims trapped into our limits
    Blind beliefs that lead us: "Trust in what we can perceive with senses".
    Thousands minds that reflect our tendency to flatten layers of knowledge,
    demonstrating that we're just wasting our time.
    Look above us, sky is just a fragment and shows us how we're nothing more than ants.
    Human weakness is what we hide, overwhelming celebration of our fault .
    Entwined with our fears of being in your hands, we're deaf to the universe that guides us.
    How can we enhance our thin perception of every small wonder hiding behind simple shapes?

  9. #29
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Location
    Kanto
    Posts
    9

    Default

    Every generation has its 'overpowered' pokemon
    1st Gen: Dragonite, or basically any psychic-type (Their only weaknesses were bug and ghost, which the majority, if not all, of those moves did set amounts of damage)
    2nd Gen: Except for this one. I can't exactly find an overpowered one here.
    3rd Gen: Salamance, rayquaza, and metagross could all be considered overpowered.
    4th Gen: Garchomp and Dialga might be overpowered, too, if you think about it.
    5th Gen: I haven't played this one, so I'm not sure about it.
    Hey, it's me, Mecha-Caterpie! Like what I have to say? Like us on facebook! Just click here!


    Feel like battling? If you have a 4th generation Pokemon game, enter my Friend Code in! 2665 9900 9349, and name? Ty-Son!

  10. #30
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    New York
    Posts
    2,340

    Default

    Can't tell. We barely know anything about the five Pokémon that were introduced. I know we'll learn about more soon!
    Credit|Xbox Gamertag: iDeadlyPanda|3DS FC: 0602-6674-5548 |NNID: ThePandaMan


    Claimed: Mario from the Mario Series and LoZ: Wind Waker
    Claimed Pokémon:


  11. #31
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    The Old West
    Posts
    4,575

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by randomspot555 View Post
    Except "power creep" really hasn't affected the game all that much because it doesn't really exist and is too broad and vague to make a good analysis, either of the series in general or the metagame specifically.
    Competitively, power creep refers to the metagame becoming more offensive as you go on. Some pokemon just can't be reliably countered. Once apon a time, this would of sent them strait to ubers, but now there is so many, it's much easier just to base it off the amount of checks. Personally, I still think the metagame is interesting, but for a good competitive player, there should be no denying that new threats are becoming more difficult to deal with without outspeeding.

    Practically nothing reliable counters Terrakion. Okay, sure, Golurk and Nidoqueen might because of their convenient typing, and Gliscor and Skarmory will if they are up against the correct sets, but if you count Nidoking, that's only about 5 pokemon, and they aren't even reliable. I mean, what are the Nidos going to do if it carries earthquake? And Skarmory really won't like coming in on Choice Band Close Combat. Keldeo? Sure, the Latis could handle it fairly well, but even a choice specs Hydro Pump in the rain will but a dent in them, even with their resistance to it.

    At this point, even stall based teams have to carry choice scarfers or speed freaks.

  12. #32
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    8,915

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Zachmac View Post
    Competitively, [words]
    Yes, I know what it means in that sense. What most people mean, when its used here, is "OH MY POOR FAVORITE POKEMON FROM [favorite gen] KEEPS GETTING BEAT BY THESE DUMB NEW POKEMON!!!" whereas really, every generation has a handful of powerful+versatile or powerful in one particular area. Every generation really has just about the same amount of "powerful" Pokemon and whatnot. I believe OU right now is almost divided evenly between the 5 generations, for example.
    I'm part of the staff at Project Pokemon! Smod in forums, AOP in IRC, Administrator on Shoddy. Come visit us. Our Project is Pokemon!

  13. #33
    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Posts
    446

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by randomspot555 View Post
    Yes, I know what it means in that sense. What most people mean, when its used here, is "OH MY POOR FAVORITE POKEMON FROM [favorite gen] KEEPS GETTING BEAT BY THESE DUMB NEW POKEMON!!!" whereas really, every generation has a handful of powerful+versatile or powerful in one particular area. Every generation really has just about the same amount of "powerful" Pokemon and whatnot. I believe OU right now is almost divided evenly between the 5 generations, for example.
    I agree with this.

  14. #34
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Posts
    2

    Default

    I also think they are weaker. I don't think they can even beat the old ones.

  15. #35
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Posts
    6,964

    Default

    Game Freak never seems to Pokémon with hardcore competition in mind. Whether it's good or not on a blood soaked battlefield always seems to be mere coincidence. Though, with the evolutions in generation 4 and the Dream World in generation 5, it's clear proof that they know some of the old guys need a boost.
        Spoiler:- 3DS friend-code:

  16. #36

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Dark Storm View Post
    Power creep has been happening for a long time now.
    No offense, but if power creep really has happened, than how come Pokemon, all the way from Gen I, can keep up with Gen V?

    Credit goes to Dragonitor for this user bar.
    Current Shinies:"MM" "MM" "RE"

    Current Hunts in White: "MM":650(PAUSED) "CH" "MM": 150

    Hunts in White 2: "SR":350 "SR":4500
    Future hunts: hunt: "SR" "SR"


    Ready to start hunting!

    To those wondering: My shiny pokemon are not up for trade... yet. I only hunt for my shinies at the moment.

  17. #37
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    The Old West
    Posts
    4,575

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by randomspot555 View Post
    Yes, I know what it means in that sense. What most people mean, when its used here, is "OH MY POOR FAVORITE POKEMON FROM [favorite gen] KEEPS GETTING BEAT BY THESE DUMB NEW POKEMON!!!" whereas really, every generation has a handful of powerful+versatile or powerful in one particular area. Every generation really has just about the same amount of "powerful" Pokemon and whatnot. I believe OU right now is almost divided evenly between the 5 generations, for example.
    Well, this is true. I'm just used to the power creep being referred to by people with general competitive knowledge, so it wasn't exactly a Charizard VS. Stealth Rock scenario that came to mind.

    Sorry about that.
    No offense, but if power creep really has happened, than how come Pokemon, all the way from Gen I, can keep up with Gen V?
    The power creep exist, but it's also very, very slow. And from my understanding, the power creep refers to pokemon having stats concentrated more into certain areas, rather then having all around higher stats. And power isn't the only thing that determines a battle either. This means they either have to sacrifice speed or longevity for it. Chandelure, for example, has base 145 special attack, which is almost comparable to that of Mewtwo's, and has 20 stat points in total than it's gen 1 counterpart, Gengar. Yet, despite this, it can takes physical hits even worse then Gengar, and also has much lower speed.
    Last edited by Zachmac; 20th January 2013 at 4:47 AM.

  18. #38

    Default

    Something people also tend to overlook is that there are simply more of these "powerful" Pokemon as the game advances. For example, in Generation I, obviously all the powerful (e.g. OU tier) dudes were from that generation. However, in Generation V, obviously less of these Pokemon would still be considered powerful since they have so many competitors. Based on the Smogon statistics from an earlier post on this thread, the distribution of the top 20 OU Pokemon seems to be relatively balanced - 5 from Generation I, 4 from II, 4 from III, 4 from IV and 2 from V (small anomaly here).

    140 base Attack doesn't mean the Pokemon is actually overpowered, because it can suck in other areas like Defense and Speed which "balance" its stats out. Earlier generation Pokemon were, in general, just more well-rounded in terms of stats as compared to today's Pokemon though their outstanding stats may be lacklustre.


    I have chosen!

  19. #39

    Default

    the starters stats and the 2 legendaries that we know so far will most likely have similar stats as previous gens
    My Black FC: 2795-7384-8121 MY SHOP- http://www.serebiiforums.com/showthr...iny-Event-Shop

  20. #40
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Outside of Hawaii (I wish...)
    Posts
    5,937

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ParaChomp View Post
    Game Freak never seems to Pokémon with hardcore competition in mind. Whether it's good or not on a blood soaked battlefield always seems to be mere coincidence. Though, with the evolutions in generation 4 and the Dream World in generation 5, it's clear proof that they know some of the old guys need a boost.
    I'm not so sure about the abilities, considering things like Vital Spirit for Delibird and Overcoat on practically anything that's capable of having it (You'd think they could at least give it to something that isn't already immune to one of the weather types)...

    Sableye and Quagsire are probably some of the best examples of Pokemon that went from horrible to amazing thanks to their DW abilities, and it's a pity they couldn't follow the same line of logic for all of the mediocre Pokemon.

Page 2 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •