The logic is flawed no matter what anyone thinks.
Originally Posted by Ciccone
Even if Charizard isn't Ash's, would somebody please explain to me why Charizard and Dragonite aren't in the summary?
Seriously you can't argue that Ash's Charizard is so important that it would be in the summary and yet argue an non important Charizard wouldn't.
Since when is a returning Pokemon so important that it would take precedence over anything else.
We don't know WHEN the Charizard is appearing, it's clearly not happening in the beginning episode.
WE ONLY HAVE the first information of this episode. Why do you people think they are going to tell us everything about the episode? Because that's all I am seeing "Oh no they've spelled everything out, clearly it's not Ash's Charizard, even though that's false and all they've done is set up the episode, but I'm going to be biased and think the set up for the episode implies it's not Ash's Charizard. Totally 100% confirmed"
Misinterpreting my posts is not your fault, negative repping me, and getting very sensitive about my posts because you misinterpreted my posts however is your fault. Think really hard, before negative repping or making a big deal about my posts. I don't appreciate being negative repped for reasons that are a result of misinterpreting my posts.