Pokémon TCG Help Thread [Gameplay questions]

[TheFightingPikachu]

You can only evelve a Pokemon normally (by playing it from your hand) once per turn. For example you can't have a Charmander in play, evelve it to Charmeleon and then to Charizard in the same turn. The term "This counts as evolving that Pokémon" means you can't evolve that Pokemon the normal way (from your hand) again that turn.
However, card effects can override that. For example you could use that Nidoqueen's PokePower twice in one turn if you had two of them in play. Or you could use Nidoqueen's PokePower and then play Wally's Training that same turn to evolve it again. But you wouldn't be able to use Nidoqueen's PokePower and then evolve that Pokemon again from your hand that turn.

It's kind of hard to explain. Did what I said make sense?

Oh yes, that made a lot of sense. Your explanation even added another important distinction that I hadn't thought of: There's a definite difference between using a power like that after you evolve normally (which works because the power isn't normal) and trying to use the power first and then evolve normally (which doesn't because "this counts as evolving that Pokémon"). Thanks!




Okay, now I have a really weird question. I've enjoyed using strategies involving powers like Sceptile's Energy Trans. Its effect is clear: as often as you want during your turn you can move a Grass Energy card from one of your Pokémon to another. If a card happened to be providing Grass Energy, it seemed obvious that it would not count as a Grass Energy card.

However, several new cards that I like and am thinking of using have Abilities with different wording. They are Klinklang's Shift Gear and Hydreigon's Dark Trance. They read almost exactly the same except with different Energy types (Metal and Darkness respectively). They say you are allowed to move "a Metal Energy" or "a Darkness Energy" as often as you like; they do not specify "Energy card."

This wording difference gave me an idea that is almost too good to be true. Would either of these Abilities be allowed to move a Blend Energy (GFPD with Hydreigon's or WLFM with KlingKlang's)? Each of these cards does provide the Energy type listed on the power, but does that mean that for the purposes of those Abilities it would count as "a Metal Energy" or "a Darkness Energy"? (I could have asked the same question about Rainbow Energy, but since it doesn't look like it's modified legal right now, I'd only be able to try it in unlimited.) I realize it could easily be that "Energy" and "Energy card" may very well be intended to mean the same thing in that context. But since it might not, I had to ask. Any info?

[SkittyOnWailord]

Okay, now I have a really weird question. I've enjoyed using strategies involving powers like Sceptile's Energy Trans. Its effect is clear: as often as you want during your turn you can move a Grass Energy card from one of your Pokémon to another. If a card happened to be providing Grass Energy, it seemed obvious that it would not count as a Grass Energy card.

However, several new cards that I like and am thinking of using have Abilities with different wording. They are Klinklang's Shift Gear and Hydreigon's Dark Trance. They read almost exactly the same except with different Energy types (Metal and Darkness respectively). They say you are allowed to move "a Metal Energy" or "a Darkness Energy" as often as you like; they do not specify "Energy card."

This wording difference gave me an idea that is almost too good to be true. Would either of these Abilities be allowed to move a Blend Energy (GFPD with Hydreigon's or WLFM with KlingKlang's)? Each of these cards does provide the Energy type listed on the power, but does that mean that for the purposes of those Abilities it would count as "a Metal Energy" or "a Darkness Energy"? (I could have asked the same question about Rainbow Energy, but since it doesn't look like it's modified legal right now, I'd only be able to try it in unlimited.) I realize it could easily be that "Energy" and "Energy card" may very well be intended to mean the same thing in that context. But since it might not, I had to ask. Any info?

Yes, that would work. Cards like Rainbow Energy provide all types of energy at all times (while in play). So that means you would be able to use Powers/Abilities like Sceptile's Energy Trans or Klinklang's Shift Gear to move them.

[Mukuro]

Can I play a Blaziken Level X onto, a for instance Eric's Blaziken / SP Blaziken?

[SkittyOnWailord]

Can I play a Blaziken Level X onto, a for instance Eric's Blaziken / SP Blaziken?

I assume you mean Blaziken FB Lv.X? Blaziken FB Lv.X says

Put this card onto your Active Blaziken FB. Blaziken FB Lv. X can use any attack, Poké-Power, or Poké-Body from its previous Level.

The part I bolded indicates that yoiu have to put it on a Blaziken FB and not any other kind of Blaziken. Just like how you can't put Raichu Lv.X on a Surfing Pikachu. Because it says to put it on "Pikachu" and Surfing Pikachu isn't the same as Pikachu.

[Swagsire]

Question. My opponent has a darkrai EX from DEX on the bench, and a sableye in front with a dark energy. I have a jellicent on the bench, from BoC, which increases retreat cost by one. Since Darkrai EX drops retreat to zero, does that mean any pokemon with a dark energy affected by darkrai would then require 1 energy discarded to retreat? or would darkrai override that? Great ideas Qwaa...

[Wishing Star]

Question. My opponent has a darkrai EX from DEX on the bench, and a sableye in front with a dark energy. I have a jellicent on the bench, from BoC, which increases retreat cost by one. Since Darkrai EX drops retreat to zero, does that mean any pokemon with a dark energy affected by darkrai would then require 1 energy discarded to retreat? or would darkrai override that? Great ideas Qwaa...

From what I understand, Darkrai EX doesn't make Pokémon with Darkness Energy attached to them have a retreat cost of 0, but instead makes them have no retreat cost, which would make me say that something that doesn't exist can't be modified. Having these effects apply in timestamp order probably would be too confusing and probably isn't the case.

[TheFightingPikachu]

Yes, that would work. Cards like Rainbow Energy provide all types of energy at all times (while in play). So that means you would be able to use Powers/Abilities like Sceptile's Energy Trans or Klinklang's Shift Gear to move them.

Wow. I didn't even expect Sceptile's power to be good for that, but I checked Pokegym's Compendium to find that there was a ruling (or something) allowing for that, which is cool. Anyway, now if I make a deck with Klinklang or Hydreigon, I won't be as limited in my Energy choices. Thanks for the info!

Question. My opponent has a darkrai EX from DEX on the bench, and a sableye in front with a dark energy. I have a jellicent on the bench, from BoC, which increases retreat cost by one. Since Darkrai EX drops retreat to zero, does that mean any pokemon with a dark energy affected by darkrai would then require 1 energy discarded to retreat? or would darkrai override that? Great ideas Qwaa...

There's one I can definitely answer! Darkrai EX overrides the other effect, or, more accurately, makes it pointless. In contrast to the point Wishing Star makes, it appears that the two wordings, "retreat cost is zero" and the one found on the Ability Dark Cloak, "has no retreat cost" mean exactly the same thing. Therefore, to explain, consider the following example:

Emboar (BW) was the first card I could find with a retreat cost of four, so let's go with that. Emboar is active, has one Darkness Energy on it and Darkrai EX is on the bench while the Jellicent you mentioned is on the other player's bench. His retreat cost calculation goes like this: 4 + 1 - EVERYTHING = 0.

Instead of "EVERYTHING," you could probably just read "infinity," just as long as you remember that a resulting retreat cost of negative infinity would not make sense in this context. The answer can only be zero.

[Wishing Star]

There's one I can definitely answer! Darkrai EX overrides the other effect, or, more accurately, makes it pointless. In contrast to the point Wishing Star makes, it appears that the two wordings, "retreat cost is zero" and the one found on the Ability Dark Cloak, "has no retreat cost" mean exactly the same thing.

I know for certain that they don't mean the same thing (by definition, since None != 0), but that the end result is the same between both meanings. But anyways:

Some cards say that "The Defending Pokémon can't retreat during your opponent's next turn." Does this apply only for the object that the Defending Pokémon is at that time, or does it apply throughout the entirety of your opponent's turn on whatever the Active Pokémon just so happens to be on their turn? In other words, if a Spinarak used a move that said that "the Defending Pokémon can't retreat during your opponent's next turn", and on their turn, they use something to switch their Active with a Benched, can the new Active Pokémon then retreat?

[SkittyOnWailord]

I know for certain that they don't mean the same thing (by definition, since None != 0), but that the end result is the same between both meanings. But anyways:

Some cards say that "The Defending Pokémon can't retreat during your opponent's next turn." Does this apply only for the object that the Defending Pokémon is at that time, or does it apply throughout the entirety of your opponent's turn on whatever the Active Pokémon just so happens to be on their turn? In other words, if a Spinarak used a move that said that "the Defending Pokémon can't retreat during your opponent's next turn", and on their turn, they use something to switch their Active with a Benched, can the new Active Pokémon then retreat?

Effects of attacks like Spinarak's Spider Web (The Defending Pokemon can't retreat during your opponent's next turn) are only there as long as the defending Pokemon that was attacked stays the active Pokemon. So if the use a card like Switch then they'll be able to retreak again as normal.
An attack would have to be worded like SW Gardevoir's Psychic Lock if it were to stop all of their Pokemon from doing something next turn.

[Wishing Star]

Effects of attacks like Spinarak's Spider Web (The Defending Pokemon can't retreat during your opponent's next turn) are only there as long as the defending Pokemon that was attacked stays the active Pokemon. So if the use a card like Switch then they'll be able to retreak again as normal.
An attack would have to be worded like SW Gardevoir's Psychic Lock if it were to stop all of their Pokemon from doing something next turn.

Alright, awesome. Speaking of that exact card, it says that your opponent can't use PokéPowers "on" his or her Pokémon. I'm assuming it means "PokéPowers of his or her Pokémon", right? (I could see why it says "on", since they are "on" the Pokémon, after all.)

Also, what effects does evolving a Pokémon lift in addition to Special Conditions? Would it remove that "the Defending Pokémon can't retreat during [this turn]" restriction of that Spinarak?

[SkittyOnWailord]

Alright, awesome. Speaking of that exact card, it says that your opponent can't use PokéPowers "on" his or her Pokémon. I'm assuming it means "PokéPowers of his or her Pokémon", right? (I could see why it says "on", since they are "on" the Pokémon, after all.)

Also, what effects does evolving a Pokémon lift in addition to Special Conditions? Would it remove that "the Defending Pokémon can't retreat during [this turn]" restriction of that Spinarak?

"On" seems like the right word choice to me. :/

And evolving or devolving (with a card's effect) removes pretty much the same effects from that Pokemon as the Pokemon going to the bench.

[Wishing Star]

"On" seems like the right word choice to me. :/

And evolving or devolving (with a card's effect) removes pretty much the same effects from that Pokemon as the Pokemon going to the bench.

Eh, "on" connotes that PokéPowers that affect a Pokémon can't be used, not PokéPowers that those Pokémon have in general. :/

Is there any particular reason why (d)evolving a Pokémon removes restrictions like that (and Special Conditions as well, if I remember correctly)? Or is it just intrinsically part of the game rules solely for balancing reasons?

[Bla7kCaT]

im looking for a way to skip a basic pokemon. anyway whatsoever. for example, i want to play a charmeleon (just an example), is there anyway in the game whatsoever he can ever make it on the field without having a charmander?
maybe a card that acts as a proxy for other pokemon, or a substitute basic, anything whatsoever at all?

[Bla7kCaT]

are there any TRAINER cards that let you access one of YOUR prize cards? i know Impostor Professor Oak's Invention lets your opponent shuffle their prizes into their deck and readd 6. and i know theres some japanese cards that do.. Lt. Surge's Treaty and Misty's Wish both do IF your oponent agrees.. are there any that actually let you get one of your prize cards?
or is there a card that makes your opponent activate one of your trainer cards (kind of a reverse approach)?

[SkittyOnWailord]

im looking for a way to skip a basic pokemon. anyway whatsoever. for example, i want to play a charmeleon (just an example), is there anyway in the game whatsoever he can ever make it on the field without having a charmander?
maybe a card that acts as a proxy for other pokemon, or a substitute basic, anything whatsoever at all?

The only ways I can think of are Garchomp Lv.X's Restore attack or the supporter Archie.

are there any TRAINER cards that let you access one of YOUR prize cards? i know Impostor Professor Oak's Invention lets your opponent shuffle their prizes into their deck and readd 6. and i know theres some japanese cards that do.. Lt. Surge's Treaty and Misty's Wish both do IF your oponent agrees.. are there any that actually let you get one of your prize cards?
or is there a card that makes your opponent activate one of your trainer cards (kind of a reverse approach)?

This Rotom's PokePower comes to mind.

[ven?]

Bla7kCaT@ azelf from legends awakens, also other then the new ditto, other wise no yomust evolve.


Wishing Star@ evolution and the loss of status effects is a format rule and unlimited rule, however if you would like to revise the rule for you're own game play that is possible.

[Kraeseth]

Greetings.

I would like to create a deck centered around 3 Aerodactyls from Dark Explorers... Having 3 of these Pokemon sat on my bench would provide a nice damage boost to the rest of my team thanks to Aerodactyl's passive ability "Ancient Scream". However I am unsure how exactly to get the Aerodactyls from my hand or deck onto my bench.

I have 2 Old Amber Item cards & I am in the process of obtaining a Twist Mountain Stadium card. When reading the description for each of these cards I am still somewhat confused...

Old Amber - Description: Look at the bottom 7 cards of your deck. You may reveal an Aerodactyl you find there & put it onto your bench. Shuffle the other cards back into your deck.

^^ I have started many games with an Aerodactyl or 2 dealt in my opening hand... So how do I get these cards from my hand to the bottom of my deck so that I can use an Old Amber to retrieve them?

Twist Mountain - Description: Once during each player's turn, that player may flip a coin. If heads, the player puts a Restored Pokemon from his or her hand onto his or her bench.

^^ What is the definition of a "Restored Pokemon" & how do you restore them? Does it mean that if I happen to have an Aerodactyl in my hand I can then play it?... Or is it required for an item (such as an Old Amber) to have been used on it?

Any info would be much appreciated. Also, any tips on how to play this style of deck would be most welcome too.

Many thanks for your time.

[Asrialys]

Old Amber - Description: Look at the bottom 7 cards of your deck. You may reveal an Aerodactyl you find there & put it onto your bench. Shuffle the other cards back into your deck.

^^ I have started many games with an Aerodactyl or 2 dealt in my opening hand... So how do I get these cards from my hand to the bottom of my deck so that I can use an Old Amber to retrieve them?

There currently aren't any cards that can put a card from your hand to the bottom of your deck. Your best bet is using N or Pokemon Communication to put them back into your deck. And then using an Old Amber to hopefully. I don't think there currently are any cards within the Modified format that can even take some cards from the top of your deck and put one or more on the bottom, like Call of Legends' Research Record.

Twist Mountain - Description: Once during each player's turn, that player may flip a coin. If heads, the player puts a Restored Pokemon from his or her hand onto his or her bench.

^^ What is the definition of a "Restored Pokemon" & how do you restore them? Does it mean that if I happen to have an Aerodactyl in my hand I can then play it?... Or is it required for an item (such as an Old Amber) to have been used on it?

Just like how a card is Basic or Stage 1, unevolved fossil Pokemon will instead say Restored.

Any info would be much appreciated. Also, any tips on how to play this style of deck would be most welcome too.

One effective combination is Tornadus EX and Twist Mountain. For a Double Colorless Energy, Tornadus EX can hit for 30 plus an other 30 if a Stadium card is in play.

[Wishing Star]

How do you tell whether or not something that's printed on a card is a cost?

For example, Ultra Ball says to "discard two cards from [the player's] hand" and that if the player can't discard two cards, they can't play Ultra Ball. This would mean that discarding two cards would be a cost.

However, Junk Arm says to "discard two cards from [the player's] hand" without explicitly saying that it can't be played if the user can't discard two cards.

Why is it that Junk Arm can't be used if my hand contains only it and a Water Energy? Why is it not assumed that Junk Arm's "discard two cards" is a "do as much as you can" thing?

[Asrialys]

How do you tell whether or not something that's printed on a card is a cost?

For example, Ultra Ball says to "discard two cards from [the player's] hand" and that if the player can't discard two cards, they can't play Ultra Ball. This would mean that discarding two cards would be a cost.

However, Junk Arm says to "discard two cards from [the player's] hand" without explicitly saying that it can't be played if the user can't discard two cards.

Why is it that Junk Arm can't be used if my hand contains only it and a Water Energy? Why is it not assumed that Junk Arm's "discard two cards" is a "do as much as you can" thing?

There can be some inconsistencies in wording for Trainer/Item cards, but essentially, Trainer/Item cards cannot be used with to no effect and you must be able to fulfill their costs to be able to use them. Once you are able to use a Trainer/Item card, then you can "do as much as you can" if you can perform at least one of its effects. You can only take one basic Energy from your discard pile with Energy Retrieval if there is only one there. You can search through your deck with an Ultra Ball or Pokemon Communication, but you can fail the search if you wish, since the deck is "private" to the rules of the game.